Is Bush and company pursuing a Wag the Puppy strategy. Having talk about the upcoming war drown out any attention paid to the economy and budget mess?
Gary Permalink on 8/28/2002
Good NY Times opinion, free registration required, about the stupid fuss being made over requiring incoming freshman to read about the Koran.
Writer points out his daughter had required English reading on sections of the Bible this summer.
"A monolithic framework does not create a critical mind," remarked the religious philosopher David Hartman. "Where there is only one self-evident truth, nothing ever gets challenged and no sparks of creativity ever get generated. The strength of America has always been its ability to challenge its own truths by presenting alternative possibilities. That forces you to justify your own ideas, and that
competition of ideas is what creates excellence."
Gary Permalink on 8/28/2002
Scott Rosenberg further makes my case. Yes, we want Saddam gone, but what is there to justify massive military intervention now?
One main thing is technological advances. True, Saddam is likely to have effective Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD's) relatively soon so it could be we should deal with him very soon. The other hand is
every country in the world and every terrorist group with over a million dollars can have access to that capability fairly soon. On
the gripping hand, I don't think the Bush team is smart enough to evolve whatever kind of doctrine that is needed to protect the American people. Maybe
Lexx is right, we are a type 13 planet species doomed to near term extinction.
Gary Permalink on 8/28/2002
Tara Sue Grubb is my kind of Libertarian candidate. Smart, heart in the right place and running against a corporate Republican dinosaur. It is also nice she has no Democrat opponent. ;-)
Gary Permalink on 8/27/2002
There have been recent hate attacks on the National Education Association by the usual rabid right dogs. The object of the ire was educational material they prepared for teachers on how to talk about the 9/11 attack. In the 20 or more links they seized on one that said teachers should avoid suggesting that all Arab-Americans are to blame for the attacks. Hunh? This is not a good thing?
Somehow in the last couple of weeks I have listened to Rush and
O'Reilly a couple of times for a few minutes and find I have to turn it off for being too ludicrous. Rush starting attacking some Indiana worker who complained he was forty years old and couldn't find a job paying $10 an hour. (Indiana has lost most of it's good paying blue collar jobs. Related article on Indiana education and job issues
here.) O'Reilly incensed that a college was requiring incoming freshman to read a book on Arabs and Islam. Of course, I imagine that Rush and O'Reilly would naturally oppose education and reading, they would lose their audience.
Gary Permalink on 8/27/2002
Current American politics. I am not crazy about his title
"24 Ways Republicans Lie" because this is simply the current American political process but Republicans are better at it.
Gary Permalink on 8/27/2002
Bush considering assassination squads. Interesting that the reuters version of this article disappeared from U.S. sites. Their is a minor technical error in the article. The U.S. Army Rangers also have assassination squads. My nephew requested a transfer when he was asked to take that special training. He's still a Ranger, just not an assassin.
Gary Permalink on 8/27/2002
Cartoon
Operation Tips: American Citizens Stopping Evil-doers
Gary Permalink on 8/24/2002
Camps for Citizens: Ashcroft's Hellish Vision
"Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft's announced desire for camps for U.S. citizens he deems to be "enemy combatants" has moved him from merely being a political embarrassment to being a constitutional menace."
"Every generation has its test of principle in which people of good faith can no longer remain silent in the face of authoritarian ambition. If we cannot join together to fight the abomination of American camps, we have already lost what we are defending."
Yeah, I thought this was important enough to repeat.
Gary Permalink on 8/24/2002
We'd better speak up now -- before, not after, the body bags start arriving.
Marc Cooper is complaining about the Democrats not objecting to the coming war with Iraq.
He managed to be in Iraq shortly before the last war and notes the "sheer and sinister megalomaniacal evil" that pervades the country. But he felt that war was unjustified and this coming war is even less justified.
During Iraq War 1, I was deeply troubled but supported it because the world should not permit invasions of other countries and doing nothing when Iraq took Kuwait would be a terrible precedent.
This time there is no strong case other than the evolving doctrine of
Pax Americana.
"We don't like you. We are the World Empire. No one can stop us from destroying Evil around the world."
I have no problem opposing this war.
Gary Permalink on 8/20/2002
NY Times (need to register) - Interesting, the Republican majority of Supreme Court justices rejects as ''ahistorical literalism" a plain reading of the Constitution.
There is also
opinion that Daddy Bush used Scowcroft to send Junior a message that Junior is going about the coming 2nd Iraqi War wrong.
Gary Permalink on 8/19/2002
A Republican congressman was illegally trying to influence the Taliban before 9/11. "Federal law – commonly referred to as the Logan Act -- makes it a felony for a citizen to negotiate with any foreign government or agent of a foreign government with the intent to influence the conduct of that foreign government." Probably as a good Republican Rohrabacher must have felt at home with the Taliban and so just offered advice as a friend.
Gary Permalink on 8/19/2002
Ashcroft is a constitutional menace. He now wants to strip US citizens of their rights and place them in internment camps.
Gary Permalink on 8/19/2002
"I have friends who are more libertarian. I am moderate in that I think
government is necessary and even good as long as checks and balances
evolve. Lebanon and Somalia are examples are what happens when you
have no government, you get rule by gangs instead.
I am further to the left economically, more than years ago, as I have
experience with corporations and am familiar with history.
Corporations serve their owners interests and unchecked can result in
loss of liberty.
Maybe I am more a "check and balance" guy who isn't described properly
by anything I've seen
I did notice that
Political Compass was a British site. I score 80% personal
self-government and 40% economic self-government"
here - My reply to a comment on political links on this blog.
"Hayek would have us all so concerned about the government
making us serfs that we would willingly enserf ourselves to private capital
just to avoid it.
I'd rather eliminate serfdom. Of course some people would not want that to
be possible ..." - B. Ross Ashley in the
sff.people.elizabeth-moon newsgroup
I agree with the above and think
Hayek ignores the loss of liberty caused by corporations.
Gary Permalink on 8/17/2002
I think Paglia, here on Andrew Sullivan, is almost a nut case, but a fascinating, intelligent nut case. I do find myself agreeing with her at times.
Here she is on the current Middle East conflict: "World Islam, it has become clear, is a totalizing creed that, whatever its spiritual beauties, invades politics and stifles dissent."
I would have to add to that American Christian fundamentalism and Mormonism. This is due to the authoritarian nature of their belief structures. Don't worry, I'll also add elements of Catholicism and Judaism so I can be an equal opportunity offender.
Gary Permalink on 8/15/2002