Saturday, May 03, 2003

Why Are We Not At War With Syria?


UPI -- The White House is trying to swiftly kill this story.

"The hawks didn't understand the emphasis had all changed: Everything was focused, not on the war any more, but on the president's re-election."


This official added that Rove had handled the elections of 2002 on the basis that "the American public knew the economy was a disaster, but the president asked them to put the war on terror first, and to vote Republican. And the public voted Republican. We think he felt any movement into Syria was pushing his luck."

The hawks proposed punitive raids because Syria and the United States already were bristling at each other, and the war simply took an unfortunate series of circumstances and brought them to a point of crisis, administration sources said.

In spite of Syria's heightened cooperation in the war on terror, with Syria giving the United States much useful information about al-Qaida, it was still supporting Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in the war.

The hawks also saw Syria as the only remaining military threat to Israel, the sources said.

More and more this looks like Israel's war, not ours.

Anna Perez, White House communications counselor, Friday sharply contested a United Press International report that national security adviser Condoleezza Rice and political adviser Karl Rove shut down a Pentagon plan to expand the Iraqi ground war to Syria in closing days of combat.

Communications counselor, business term for official pr person and lier who is not close enough to do more than what he or she is told.

No comments: