This article irritates me. A main advocate for Iraqi invasion acknowledges the Hell Iraq is today but defends the moral rightness in removing Saddam.
No one said Saddam was a saint. But to ignore the obvious consequences of illegal invasion was criminal. Like many pro-war advocates he doesn't think the consequences were obvious. Is it the fault of those of us who were right all along that the pro-war people who defamed us (and still defame occupation opponents) are short sighted and ignorant?
UPDATE - A more informed take that says what I said.