Thursday, January 06, 2005

Why Senators Should Contest the Vote


Hunter at Daily Kos calls on Senators to contest the electoral vote. I agree for the reasons stated. Not because we believe it will change who won but to draw attention to the shameful conduct in Ohio.

It will later come out that there was massive voter suppression in this election but why wait for years, particularly with the national media as cowed as it is.

Olbermann has been told that up to six Senators will contest the Ohio electors.
Nothing is in writing and daybreak is a long way away, but it appeared all but certain in early evening Wednesday that House Democrats had secured the support of up to half a dozen Senators to formally challenge the Electoral College slate from Ohio, when the votes are opened before a joint session of Congress tomorrow.

Congressional sources tell this reporter that the house half of the written objection — which has the declared support of more than a dozen Representatives — is expected to be signed by Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones of Ohio. Republican leadership expects the Senate signatory to be Barbara Boxer of California, but this has not yet been formalized. The Majority is also worried about the possible absence of many of its members in both houses, and the prospect that a quorum might not be achieved, leading the process into uncharted, albeit not very threatening, constitutional grounds. There is a mathematical, if not practical, chance that the ratification of the Electoral College vote could be delayed past tomorrow.

As it is, a written challenge would require the joint session to suspend for several hours, during which the Senate and the House would meet separately and debate the merits of the objection.

No comments: