Why Are There No Child Pornography of Violence Laws?

Pro-Life Targets Kids With Aborted Fetus Photos

I am not in favor of pornography laws but sort of see the point when they are talking about protecting children from adult images. (I really only see that point when there is violence involved, if you want healthier kids let them see people in loving relationships without clothes.)

There are no laws protecting children from violent images.

Right-wing groups raise a fuss when there are violent images that do not support their agenda - like the recent abuse photos from Iraq. So how come they are filing civil liberties lawsuits for the right to display huge aborted fetus photos by schools?

More naked dead baby photos on truck billboards - offensive content.

Pointed out by Gary Nunn